Call For A Strategy Session

(732) 303-7341
Click to Email Us Now
New Jersey DUI defense attorney
Schedule A Strategy Session
State v. Cassidy – New Jersey DWI Breath Test Case Law Explained

October 1, 2026

In 2018, the New Jersey Supreme Court decided one of the most consequential DWI cases in state history: State v. Eileen Cassidy, 235 N.J. 482 (2018). The unanimous decision threw out more than 20,000 DWI convictions based on breath tests from improperly calibrated Alcotest machines. What happened New Jersey has used the Alcotest breath-test machine since 2000. In State v.…

Read More
Anthony Vecchio Quoted by the New York Post on Blood-Alcohol Evidence in the Johnny Gaudreau Case

July 17, 2026

New Jersey DUI and criminal defense attorney Anthony J. Vecchio was recently interviewed by the New York Post regarding the disputed blood-alcohol evidence in the criminal case arising from the deaths of NHL star Johnny Gaudreau and his brother, Matthew Gaudreau. The May 3, 2026, article examined a disagreement over how the defendant’s blood sample was tested and whether the…

Read More
NJ DUI Case Law: State v. Thompson | Operation Without Driving

January 28, 2026

NJ DUI Case Law — State v. Thompson (2020) and the Meaning of “Operation” New Jersey DUI law does not require proof that a vehicle was actually driven. Instead, N.J.S.A. 39:4-50(a) prohibits the operation of a motor vehicle while under the influence. One of the leading published decisions addressing this distinction is State v. Thompson, decided by the New Jersey…

Read More
New Jersey DWI Case Law Update: State v. Mulligan (App. Div. 2025)

January 20, 2026

Case: State v. Mulligan, 2025 N.J. Super. Unpub. LEXIS 2789 (App. Div. Dec. 31, 2025)Court: Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate DivisionDocket: A-0427-23Note: Unpublished opinion (R. 1:36-3) Key Takeaway The Appellate Division reaffirmed that a DWI conviction may be sustained based on the totality of the circumstances demonstrating “operation” under N.J.S.A. 39:4-50—even where a defendant claims post-operation drinking and the…

Read More
State v. Locurto (1999): Why Municipal Court Credibility Findings Matter in NJ DUI Cases

January 12, 2026

State v. Locurto (1999): Credibility, Traffic Stops, and DUI Appeals in New Jersey Case Law Analysis Although decided in 1999, State v. Locurto, 157 N.J. 463, remains one of the most important New Jersey Supreme Court decisions governing DUI cases, traffic stops, and municipal court appeals. The case continues to shape how courts evaluate police credibility, reasonable suspicion, and appellate…

Read More
State v. Bealor (2006): The Key NJ Drug DWI Proof Case

January 11, 2026

State v. Bealor: The Seminal NJ Drug DWI Proof Case (2006) If you handle DWI cases in New Jersey, State v. Bealor is one of the most important decisions to understand—especially for drug-related DWI allegations under N.J.S.A. 39:4-50. In plain terms, Bealor explains how the State can prove drug impairment, what kind of evidence is (and isn’t) enough, and why…

Read More
NJ DUI Case Law Update: State v. Konecny (2022)

January 9, 2026

State v. Konecny (2022): NJ Supreme Court Clarifies Laurick Relief and DUI Predicate Convictions Case: State v. Konecny, 250 N.J. 321 (2022)Court: Supreme Court of New JerseyTopic: DUI predicates, Laurick relief, driving while suspended (DWS), right to counsel Key Holding In State v. Konecny, the New Jersey Supreme Court clarified when prior DWI or refusal convictions may — and may…

Read More
NJ DUI Case Law Update: State v. Coviello (2023)

January 8, 2026

State v. Coviello (2023): NJ Supreme Court Clarifies Ignition Interlock Authority in DUI Cases Case: State v. Coviello, 252 N.J. 539 (2023)Court: Supreme Court of New JerseyTopic: DUI sentencing, ignition interlock devices (IID), court vs. MVC authority Key Holding In State v. Coviello, the New Jersey Supreme Court held that the sentencing court—not the Motor Vehicle Commission (MVC)—has jurisdiction over…

Read More
Next
Rating Methodology

Charges Dismissed

Criminal Offense

Charges Reversed

Jail Sentence

Charges Reduced

DUI

Charges Dismissed

Criminal Offense

Review Image
  • / THOROUGH & EFFICIENT
    “Mr. Vecchio was very thorough and efficient. His team was accommodating and the ultimate outcome was better than expected. Mr. Vecchio kept me up to date with every detail via emails and text messages. An all around good guy and family man.”
    NOEL
  • / VERY PROFESSIONAL
    “I have been working with Anthony on my husband’s out of state case for a few days now. He is punctual and doesn’t make you feel like you are asking too many questions in such a stressful time. He knows exactly what is happening before you even tell him. He is very professional and treats you like a human at the same time with the most respect.”
    DANA
  • / SHARP & PROGRESSIVE
    "Anthony was instrumental in making the worst time in my life manageable. He's smart, intuitive and most of all he gave me peace of mind. I would recommend him to anyone looking for a sharp, progressive attorney who knows how to navigate the law."
    ALICE

1 / 3

Review Image

No aspect of this advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court of New Jersey.

[gtranslate]